Writeup — pick your guide

Router page directing readers to one of two reading-style guides (academic IMRAD or narrative arc) covering the same content.

This project’s writeup ships in two reading-style formats. Pick the one that matches how you’d like to read it.

Style Length Best for
Academic paper (IMRAD) ~20–25 min Reviewers expecting Abstract / Introduction / Methods / Results / Discussion / Limits / Conclusion / References discipline. Formal voice, technical terminology with on-first-use definitions.
Narrative arc (story) ~15–20 min Readers preferring plain-English first-person prose. Same content, story-style pacing (Hook → Setup → Investigation → Revelation → Implications).

Both guides cover the same content (problem, methods, all 7 findings, mechanism, limitations); the style and pacing differ. Technical terms are defined on first use in either guide and cross-referenced to docs/GLOSSARY.md.

Quick pointers

  • Just the numbersRESULTS.md — tables + 5 figures + raw artifact pointers, no narrative prose.
  • 60-second tourProject at a glance.
  • README + executive summaryREADME.md — 1-page distillation including the headline + mechanism + direct-detection check tables.
  • Methodology spokes (deep-dive references) → 8 files under WRITEUP/ covering data decisions, evaluation design, model details, threshold policy, reference-scorer audit, methodology guarantees, reproducibility, limitations + future work.
  • Decision trail → 81 ADRs at decisions/.

Why two guides?

The previous single-guide structure was diagnosed in the v1.3.0 restructure as “neither narrative nor academic” — informal headings plus academic numbering, methodology after results, same content rendered with different prose across multiple pages. The two-guide architecture (per ADR-078 + ADR-079) gives each reader-type a self-contained article in its native register, with no cross-page redundancy.

Old WRITEUP.md (the jumbled hybrid) content is now distributed across the two guides; the historical content remains accessible at the reviewer URL pin (tree/v1.0.0) per ADR-033 (corrected from a prior tree/v1.2.8 mis-citation per ADR-080).

Looking for a specific section?

If you arrived here from a tree/v1.0.0-era deep link (e.g., from the submission email or a bookmarked anchor), the original v1.0.0 WRITEUP.md had 7 sections. They are now redistributed as below.

§Reading guide

Reading-style routing for the methodology now lives in the dedicated READING_GUIDE.md (academic / narrative / hiring-manager / reproducer / data-only paths).

### §1 Motivation {#motivation}

Now in WRITEUP_PAPER §1 Introduction (academic framing) and WRITEUP_NARRATIVE Act 0 — Hook (narrative framing).

### §1.5 Attack-type taxonomy + train/test composition {#attack-type-taxonomy}

The train/test composition table and OOD slate breakdown now live in WRITEUP/data-decisions.md and WRITEUP_PAPER §3 Methods. The high-level taxonomy (direct / indirect / agentic-flow / jailbreak / benign-but- injection-shaped) is summarized in the README §What “OOD” means here.

### §2 Approach overview {#approach-overview}

The detector ladder + reference-scorer slate are now in WRITEUP_PAPER §3 Methods and WRITEUP/model-rungs.md. The multi-detector philosophy (lexical baseline → frozen probe → LoRA → full fine-tune + reference scorers) is in WRITEUP_NARRATIVE Act 2 — Setup.

§Results

The headline characterization (cross-family generalization failure + mechanism) is now in WRITEUP_PAPER §4 Results, WRITEUP_NARRATIVE Act 3 — Revelation, and the tables-only RESULTS.md appendix with 5 canonical figures.

### §Lessons (brief) {#lessons-brief}

Methodology reflections now live in WRITEUP_PAPER §5 Discussion and WRITEUP/limitations-and-future-work.md. The “what could be wrong with this” narrative is in WRITEUP_NARRATIVE Act 4 — Implications.

### §12 Appendix {#appendix}

The appendix-class material (operating-point tables, calibration detail, per-source breakdowns, raw artifact pointers) now lives in RESULTS.md and the WRITEUP/ spokes (8 methodology references). The decision trail is at decisions/.

For the original single-document v1.0.0 content verbatim, see the tree/v1.0.0 tag pin per ADR-033 — the historical reviewer URL is preserved unchanged.